MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214576896 · doi:10.1386/jac_00044_1

Living in a permanent wake: The cinematic and affective prisms of mourning in Zulu Love Letter

2021· article· en· W4214576896 on OpenAlex
Sakiru Adebayo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of African Cinemas · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth African History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZuluGriefFocus (optics)PsychoanalysisAestheticsHistoryPsychologyArtLiteraturePhilosophyLinguisticsPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I investigate how Zulu Love Letter makes grief visible and visceral. I focus on how the visual and aural shape of the film might be said to follow a structure of mourning. I argue that the film, based on its visual grammar of loss and grief, can be said to belong to the genre of ‘mourning films’. Therefore, the kinesic, haptic and even proxemic moments in the film can be said to have strong mournful undercurrents. In all, I argue that Zulu Love Letter does not only lay out a cinematic cartography of mourning; it also provides inklings on how the question of mourning is equally a question of memory and haunting in post-apartheid South Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it