Sex-Specific Catabolic Metabolism Alterations in the Critically Ill following High Dose Vitamin D
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmacological interventions are essential for the treatment and management of critical illness. Although women comprise a large proportion of the critically ill, sex-specific pharmacological properties are poorly described in critical care. The sex-specific effects of vitamin D3 treatment in the critically ill are not known. Therefore, we performed a metabolomics cohort study with 1215 plasma samples from 428 patients from the VITdAL-ICU trial to study sex-specific differences in the metabolic response to critical illness following high-dose oral vitamin D3 intervention. In women, despite the dose of vitamin D3 being higher, pharmacokinetics demonstrated a lower extent of vitamin D3 absorption compared to men. Metabolic response to high-dose oral vitamin D3 is sex-specific. Sex-stratified individual metabolite associations with elevations in 25(OH)D following intervention showed female-specific positive associations in long-chain acylcarnitines and male-specific positive associations in free fatty acids. In subjects who responded to vitamin D3 intervention, significant negative associations were observed in short-chain acylcarnitines and branched chain amino acid metabolites in women as compared to men. Acylcarnitines and branched chain amino acids are reflective of fatty acid B oxidation, and bioenergesis may represent notable metabolic signatures of the sex-specific response to vitamin D. Demonstrating sex-specific pharmacometabolomics differences following intervention is an important movement towards the understanding of personalized medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".