MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214592544 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-8051-5_20

How to Use the Recipes

2022· book-chapter· en· W4214592544 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bible College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecipeOperationalizationAuditComputer scienceCode (set theory)Code of practiceEngineeringProgramming languageEngineering managementBusinessAccountingHistoryEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter will contain details of how to use the recipes we present to get the expected result. It will outline the system requirements needed for the recipe, followed by where the reader can find the code. It will also talk about how the auditors can use the recipe and tweak it based on their needs. The implementers will need other granular details and may need to use the recipe in a different way than the auditors themselves, which will be discussed at the end of the chapter. Finally, implementation considerations are highlighted at the end of the chapter, including operationalizing the ML model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it