Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents an investigation of the stability of a vortex with azimuthal velocity profile V ˉ = 1 − 1 − ε r 2 e − r 2 / r . When ε = 0, the Lamb–Oseen vortex model is recovered. Although the Lamb–Oseen vortex supports propagating waves known as Kelvin waves, the flow is stable according to Rayleigh’s circulation criterion. In this paper, on the other hand, the modified vortex profile admits linearly unstable disturbances for ε > 0 and we investigate their characteristics. These may be either axisymmetric or non-axisymmetric, but we find that the axisymmetric perturbations have the largest growth rates. When their growth rates are small, it becomes very difficult to solve the linear equation governing the axisymmetric perturbations because the eigenfunctions have a rapid exponential growth as one moves outward radially from the vortex center. To deal with such cases, a modified Riccati transformation was employed and found to be effective in solving the associated eigenvalue problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".