MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selection of trees species composition for creation of forest belts on newly created agrarian landscape of a regulated landfill

2022· article· en· W4214621703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuliya V. Cheprunova, A V Tingaev

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand reclamationEnvironmental scienceMunicipal solid wasteAgricultureAgrarian societySite selectionMapleAgroforestryGeographyWaste managementEcologyEngineeringArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Every year the number of landfills for municipal solid waste (MSW) is growing all over the world. Overloaded landfills are closed, followed by reclamation and creation of agricultural landscapes. Trees and shrubs must adapt to unfavorable environmental conditions in a reclaimed MSW landfill. As a result, plants resistance is reduced. We studied the safety of planted trees and shrubs, as well as their growth over three years of research, in order to study the adaptation of woody plants to the conditions of the reclaimed MSW landfill and the effect of soil on adaptation. Canadian maple, barberry and Siberian mountain as h were studied on the experimental site of the newly formed agricultural landscape at the reclaimed MSW test site. The MSW landfill is located in the northwestern part of the city of Barnaul. According to research, mountain ash has the lowest overall survival rate at about 2%, barberry at 33%, and Canadian maple has the highest overall survival rate at 81.25%. Canadian maple can be used on the newly created agricultural landscape of MSW landfill for forest reclamation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicSoil and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207