MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214635900 · doi:10.14740/jmc3843

A Case of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With t(6;7)(q24;q31.2) Balanced Translocation

2022· article· en· W4214635900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chiharu Cho, Kazuki Kodo, Sachiko Goto, Yoshiki Katsumi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Child Health and Development
KeywordsChromosomal translocationMedicineAsymptomaticSiblingDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusSisterWolfram syndromeGeneticsInternal medicineEndocrinologyGeneBiologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most balanced translocations do not involve any gain or loss of genetic material, and individuals harboring these translocations remain clinically asymptomatic. Nevertheless, balanced translocations have reportedly been associated with several diseases. Here, we present the case of a 12-year-old boy with type 2 diabetes mellitus that could not be explained only by obesity; the patient harbored a balanced translocation (46,XY t(6;7)(q24;q31.2)). Interestingly, genetic analysis showed that his 10-year-old sister also carried the same translocation and shared the same symptoms. Further analyses are required to confirm whether this balanced translocation is associated with the symptoms presented in our patient and his sibling. The outcomes of our case study are expected to reveal novel loci causing diabetes and have implications for improved diagnosis and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207