Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The derivation of the sample covariance is difficult compared to that of the distribution of the sample correlation coefficient. This paper deals with the distributions of covariance structures appearing in real scalar/vector/matrix variables. Covariance structure is a bilinear structure. Consider a bilinear form u=X′AY where X and Y are p×1 and q×1 real vectors and A is a constant p × q matrix. The basic aim in this paper is to derive the distribution of such a structure when the components are scalar/vector/matrix Gaussian variables. The procedure used is to examine the Laplace transform or the moment generating function (mgf) coming from such a bilinear form in real scalar/vector/matrix variables. Covariance structures in several situations are shown to produce a mgf of the type (1−λ2t2)−α,λ>0,α>0,−1λ<R(t)<1λ where t is the mgf parameter, R(·) means the real part of (·), and λ and α are real scalar parameters. Explicit evaluation of the density of u is considered when α is a positive integer as well as for a general α. It is shown that the exact densities can be written as linear functions of double gamma densities and double exponential or Laplace densities when α is a positive integer. For the general value of α, it is shown that the exact density can be written in terms of double Mittag-Leffler or a double confluent hypergeometric function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it