Performance Evaluation of PI/RBFN ANN Controllers for Sensor Less BLDC Motor Control Based Fuel Cell/PV Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present society suffers with the problem of the greenhouse effect due to the emission of huge amount of carbon dioxide. And almost 70% of emission of carbon dioxide will be due to the usage of automotive vehicles. It is required to reduce the utilization of automotive vehicles to protect the life of earth for the coming years. This manuscript presents the design of electric vehicle with the utilization of renewable energy source like solar energy with the combination of fuel cell energy. It involves the design of maximum power point tracking system with intelligent fuzzy controller to track the maximum power for various weather conditions. The proposed electric vehicle drives the brush less DC motor whose speed has been monitored with the sensor less speed control technique. The speed control technique has been realized with two types of controller’s namely proportional intelligent controller and radial basis function neural network. Also the speed control technique has been analysed with the performance comparison of the two controllers in terms of speed, torque generated and also errors of speed and current to improve the performance of speed by 5% with the help of MATLAB/Simulink.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".