MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214662486 · doi:10.14740/jh942

Concurrent Presentation of Hairy Cell Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Leukemic Non-Nodal Variant): An Extremely Rare Composite Lymphoma

2022· article· en· W4214662486 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dina Sameh Soliman, Feryal Ibrahim, Liam Fernyhough, Farzana Murad, Susanna Akiki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantle cell lymphomaHairy cell leukemiaCD5ImmunophenotypingBone marrowPopulationPathologyCD20MedicineSplenic marginal zone lymphomaGene rearrangementLymphomaB cellCancer researchLeukemiaMolecular biologyBiologyImmunologyAntigenGeneticsAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

fusion, favoring the 2016 WHO new category of L-NN-MCL (CD5/SOX11-negative). Treatment with cladribine and rituximab normalized the blood counts within 6 weeks without significant side effects. L-NN-MCL is one of the smoldering MCL subtypes, recently listed in WHO 2016 as a separate variant, with a particular set of unique features and a less aggressive clinical course compared to classical MCL. To date, the clinicopathological features (including the bone marrow findings) of L-NN-MCL have not been sufficiently characterized in the literature. We describe the first report of synchronous presentation of HCL and L-NN-MCL. This case represents a real challenge from the biologic, diagnostic and therapeutic point of views, due to extremely rare combination of two distinct uncommon B-cell neoplasms. The study of composite lymphomas offers the opportunity to evaluate the etiology and the clonal interrelationship involved in the pathogenesis/evolution of lymphomas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207