A Vision-Based Detection and Spatial Localization Scheme for Forest Fire Inspection from UAV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest fires have the characteristics of strong unpredictability and extreme destruction. Hence, it is difficult to carry out effective prevention and control. Once the fire spreads, devastating damage will be caused to natural resources and the ecological environment. In order to detect early forest fires in real-time and provide firefighting assistance, we propose a vision-based detection and spatial localization scheme and develop a system carried on the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with an OAK-D camera. During the high incidence of forest fires, UAVs equipped with our system are deployed to patrol the forest. Our scheme includes two key aspects. First, the lightweight model, NanoDet, is applied as a detector to identify and locate fires in the vision field. Techniques such as the cosine learning rate strategy and data augmentations are employed to further enhance mean average precision (mAP). After capturing 2D images with fires from the detector, the binocular stereo vision is applied to calculate the depth map, where the HSV-Mask filter and non-zero mean method are proposed to eliminate the interference values when calculating the depth of the fire area. Second, to get the latitude, longitude, and altitude (LLA) coordinates of the fire area, coordinate frame conversion is used along with data from the GPS module and inertial measurement unit (IMU) module. As a result, we experiment with simulated fire in a forest area to test the effectiveness of this system. The results show that 89.34% of the suspicious frames with flame targets are detected and the localization error of latitude and longitude is in the order of 10−5 degrees; this demonstrates that the system meets our precision requirements and is sufficient for forest fire inspection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".