MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214695083 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3153355

A Time-Domain Multi-Tone Distortion Model for Effective Design of High Power Amplifiers

2022· article· en· W4214695083 on OpenAlexaff
Amir-Reza Amini, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLDMOSAmplifierComputer scienceElectronic engineeringRF power amplifierTransistorRadio frequencyFrequency domainAdjacent channel power ratioTime domainPower (physics)Behavioral modelingHarmonic balanceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsCMOSNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new time-domain multi-tone distortion (TD-MTD) model suitable for accurately predicting the non-linear behavior of packaged high power radio frequency (RF) transistors over a range of discrete non-uniformly distributed frequencies. This proposed TD-MTD model uses a single expression rather than multiple distinct frequency specific behavioral models to describe the underlying behavior of the high power RF transistor at multiple fundamental frequencies. Furthermore its extraction is carried out using a time-domain representation of the travelling waves that can be acquired using a generic vector load-pull characterization system and without imposing additional requirements. The proposed model is extracted as an artificial neural network (ANN) and is implemented as a Netlist to serve in a harmonic balance simulator based power amplifier design process. The proposed model is validated in two phases. First, its ability to reproduce the large-signal behavior of a high power RF LDMOS transistor was demonstrated in simulation. Then, the TD-MTD model was used to validate the design of a high power two-way asymmetric Doherty power amplifier and the simulated output-power-dependent power efficiency, AM/AM, AM/PM and input return loss characteristics were compared to those obtained in measurement. The excellent agreement between the simulation and measurement results confirms the usefulness of the proposed model despite the simplicity of its extraction routine and measurement data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207