A Motion Compensation Method for Shipborne HFSWR by Using Dual Reference RF Signals Generated Onshore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The echo of shipborne high-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) is modulated by six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) motion, affecting the detection of the target and the remote sensing of ocean surface dynamics parameters. Commonly, motion compensation methods of shipborne HFSWR describe each aspect of the 6-DOF motion as the superposition of sinusoidal motion, which results in the effect of motion compensation affected by the precision of 6-DOF motion parameters. A motion compensation method based on dual reference radio frequency (RF) signals is proposed in this paper, without depending on a sinusoidal motion model to describe the 6-DOF motion. By using the motion compensation parameters, which are relevant to the motion attitude and calculated from the information of dual reference RF signals located onshore, the method realizes the compensation of shipborne HFSWR echo modulated by platform 6-DOF motion. This paper proposes the extraction of reference RF signals from radar echo and analyzes the influence of the location of the reference RF signals’ emission source on the motion compensation method. The result shows that a good motion compensation effect is achieved in eliminating the influence of 6-DOF motion modulation. In addition, a traversal of different reference RF signals’ emission source locations is conducted, and the simulation results show that the method proposed in this paper has universality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".