MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214700087 · doi:10.3390/gels8030145

Compressive and Flexural Properties of Ultra-Fine Coal Gangue-Based Geopolymer Gels and Microscopic Mechanism Analysis

2022· article· en· W4214700087 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyun Yang, Yan Zhang, Cheng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueGels · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeopolymerMaterials scienceGangueMechanism (biology)Compressive strengthFlexural strengthComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geopolymer gel that possesses advantageous features of fast setting, high strength, and good durability is increasingly used in civil engineering, including rapid retrofit projects, roadway, and other construction projects. Furthermore, geopolymer gel is also a green and economical material as it derives from solid wastes. In this study, activators with different sodium silicate modulus and alkali content were used to activate ultrafine coal gangue and slag powder to prepare coal-gangue-based geopolymers with high strength. To study the influence of slag powder content, sodium silicate modulus, and alkali activator content on strength, a two-stage design was adopted. In the first stage, the orthogonal test with three factors and four levels (10−40% slag, 0.4−1.0 modulus, 16−22%) was used to obtain the influence of each factor on the strength and select the design range of the specimen mix ratio with higher strength. In the second stage, based on the orthogonal experiment, the scope was narrowed to continue to find the optimal excitation scheme and the relationship between the influencing factors and strength. Further, mineral compositional, microstructural, functional group and elemental analyses were performed using X-ray diffraction technique, IR infrared diffraction, electron microscope observation and energy spectrum analysis to elucidate the mechanisms of the strength development. The results show that the factors affecting the geopolymer’s strength were in the order of slag content > alkali content > modulus. The optimum dosage of alkali activator was 18−20%, and the sodium silicate modulus was 0.6−0.8, and the compressive and flexural strength could reach above 40 MPa and 5.9 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength and modulus were in a parabolic relationship. Three types of cementing gels (N-A-S-H, C-A-S-H, and C-N-A-S-H) that were characterized with dense structure and high strength were identified from coal gangue and slag powder after alkali excitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGelsSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207