Significance of viscous coalescence in migmatites of the Assam-Meghalaya Gneissic Complex, eastern India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The magnetite ocelli preserved in the Chandrapur area of the Assam-Meghalaya Gneissic Complex, eastern India, display viscous coalescence. The viscous coalescence phenomenon generally occurs below a critical capillary number, which is governed by the size of the coalescing droplets. The smaller the size of the coalescing droplets, the greater the possibility that they will exhibit viscous coalescing. From our results we infer that intrusion of younger pegmatitic magma into the much older polyphase deformed quartzofeldspathic gneiss of Chandrapur initiated localized partial melting in the gneissic rocks surrounding the intrusions. This localized partial melting produced small magma pools or leucocratic neosome, which was followed by intermingling between the in situ melt (leucocratic neosome) and external melt (pegmatite), leading to chaotic mixing between the two magmatic phases. Chaotic mixing produced thin veins or filaments of the pegmatitic magma as a result of stretching and folding dynamics. Gradually, the thin filaments underwent capillary instability to produce discrete viscous swirls or ocelli. The ocelli consist of leucocratic minerals like K-feldspar, plagioclase, and quartz, with crystals of magnetite at the center representing magnetite ocelli. The mineralogical assemblage of the ocelli matches that of the pegmatitic rocks. After their formation, some of the smaller magnetite ocelli underwent very gentle collisions due to the effect of capillary and viscous forces. Such collisions produced pairs, clusters, or linear structures that are now preserved in the migmatites of the study area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".