MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214732619 · doi:10.4095/329416

Reconnaissance surficial geology, Clarke River, Northwest Territories, NTS 65-M north

2022· report· en· W4214732619 on OpenAlexaffabout
D E Kerr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeltwaterGeologyOutwash plainMoraineGlacial periodGeomorphologyDrumlinGlacierBedrockIce streamTerminal moraineFluvialLineationPhysical geographyPaleontologyOceanographyCryosphereGeographySea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Clarke River map area (north half) comprises isolated areas of glacially and meltwater scoured bedrock, till veneers and blankets, locally fluted, and strongly fluted (mega-scale glacial lineations) streamlined till in the northeast. Ridged till may overlie fluted till blanket and streamlined till. Glaciofluvial esker complexes and associated meltwater outwash sediments trend westward (some may parallel pre-glacial valleys), southwestward, and northwestward. Glaciolacustrine sediments are a minor component. An early regional warm-based diverging southwestern and southern ice flow is well preserved in the central regions across the map area. The youngest late deglacial ice flows, in the extreme southwest and broader northeast region, are both northwesterly. The latter represents the Dubawnt Lake ice stream. During ice retreat, ridged till was deposited with minor moraines and larger recessional moraines locally. Ponding meltwater formed pro-glacial lakes with deltas, beaches, and trim lines from 355 m elevation, in the southwest, to 155 m, in the northeast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→