MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214743442 · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.835757

Inhibitors of Human Neuraminidase Enzymes Block Transmigration in vitro

2022· article· en· W4214743442 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Amran Howlader, Tianlin Guo, Christopher W. Cairo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Glycomics NetworkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJurkat cellsReceptorChemotaxisNeuraminidaseCell biologyIn vitroCell cultureEnzymeBiologyChemistryBiochemistryImmune systemImmunologyT cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell migration to a site of inflammation is an important step of the immune response. This process is coordinated by cytokines, receptors, and the signal processing machinery of the cell. Many cellular receptors are glycosylated, and their activity can be modulated through changes in glycan structure. Furthermore, glycosylation can be critical to the folding and trafficking of receptors. In this work, we investigated the role of native human neuraminidase enzymes (NEU) in transmigration. We used a cultured T cell line (Jurkat) and a transwell assay with fibronectin (FN) coated wells and cytokines (IL-4 and TNF-α) as chemoattractants in the bottom chamber. We observed that NEU1, NEU3, and NEU4 were positive regulators of transmigration using an siRNA knockdown. Furthermore, we found that pharmacological inhibition of these enzymes inhibited transmigration. We conclude that human NEU isoenzymes NEU1, NEU3, and NEU4 can act as positive regulators of transmigration and should be investigated as targets for anti-inflammatory strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular BiosciencesSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207