MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214777869 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.107892

Updating a dataset of labelled objects on raw video sequences with unique object IDs

2022· article· en· W4214777869 on OpenAlexaff
Takehiro Tanaka, Hyomin Choi, Ivan V. Bajić

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUncompressed videoVideo trackingArtificial intelligenceMinimum bounding boxGround truthComputer visionObject (grammar)Coding (social sciences)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an update to the previously published dataset known as SFU-HW-Objects-v1. The new dataset is called SFU-HW-Tracks-v1 and contains object annotations with unique object identities (IDs) for the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) v1 Common Test Conditions (CTC) sequences. For each video frame, ground truth annotations include object class ID, object ID, and bounding box location and its dimensions. The dataset can be used to evaluate object tracking performance on uncompressed video sequences and study the relationship between video compression and object tracking, which was not possible using SFU-HW-Objects-v1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207