MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic On-Demand Virtual Extensible LAN Tunnels via Software-Defined Wide Area Networks

2022· article· en· W4214808862 on OpenAlexaff
Gieorgi Maxim Zakurdaev, Mohammed Ismail, Chung–Horng Lung

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware as a serviceCloud computingComputer scienceSoftware-defined networkingInterconnectivityPopularityComputer networkOpenFlowSoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world of information and communications technologies continues to evolve at an exponential rate, not only inaugurating numerous breakthroughs in research, but also changing the perception of interconnectivity and exchange of information. The increasing popularity of software-defined networks (SDN) and the related technologies have shattered the realm of corporate infrastructures. The traditional approach for employees to access the corporate headquarter data centers has experienced challenges due to the significant traffic volume and delay, as more services have been moved to the cloud, e.g., Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). Tunnel-splitting can mitigate the problem, but it is mostly static. The paper proposed a dynamic on-demand tunnels approach based on Extensible LAN Tunnels (VXLAN) and SDN. The primary objectives are to reduce the load on corporate network and delay for users to access SaaS. We conducted experiments for feasibility study using Mininet and the results showed that the delay could be significantly reduced and the approach allows for a single point of policy management, which it still preserved the benefit of split tunnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC)Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207