Chalcophile Element Heterogeneity in Ni-Cu-(Platinum Group Element) Orebodies of Raglan Horizon in Cape Smith Belt: Implications for Ore-Forming Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The komatiitic Raglan Horizon in northern Quebec hosts one of the largest komatiite-associated magmatic sulfide deposits in the world. Several studies have suggested that the sulfide ores were formed by melting and transporting sedimentary sulfides from upstream after the komatiite melt had assimilated a large amount of S-rich country rocks. In this study, we report new compositional data of the sulfide ores in Zones 5-8 and 13-14 along with the legacy assay database to investigate variability of the ore-forming processes at Raglan at the camp scale. More than 90,000 drill core samples were selected, and the rocks are categorized into disseminated, net-textured, and massive sulfide based on their sulfide abundance. We demonstrate that the majority of the compositional variability of the sulfide-bearing rocks can be attributed to the difference in the mass ratio between silicate and sulfide melts (R factor), by applying thermodynamic modeling of silicate and sulfide magma evolution. The massive sulfides display depletions in Cu, Pd, and Pt that are best explained by sulfide liquid fractionation, which differentiates the residual Cu-, Pd-, and Pt-rich sulfide liquid from the Ni-rich monosulfide solid solution (MSS) cumulate now preserved within the massive sulfide ores. A small population of sulfide-bearing samples that is strongly depleted in all the economically important metals has been interpreted to represent externally derived xenomelts that were poorly equilibrated with the metal-rich host magma due to low residence time. A portion of massive sulfides has been found to be depleted in Pd and Cu but not Pt. This decoupling of these metals can be well explained by a postmagmatic process that persisted to temperatures as low as 300°–350°C. Similar depletions of Pd have also been observed in the Expo Intrusive Suite immediately to the south. The regional variations in the compositions of individual orebodies suggest that they occurred in highly localized environments that record only local magmatic conditions and that the sulfide mineralization did not reach equilibrium with a single regionally continuous silicate magma system. Each zone preserves a unique signature of assimilation, sulfide segregation, and sulfide crystallization; hence, they likely represent separate magmatic pulses within the larger Raglan system. Lastly, based on the spatial locations of the low tenor sulfides, we tentatively suggest that Zone 2 and the Katinniq zone are more proximal to the as-yet-unidentified eruption site of the Raglan komatiite lava flow field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".