MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214821327 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.807585

Abnormal Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Functional Connectivity Caused by White Matter Hyperintensity Contribute to Cognitive Decline

2022· article· en· W4214821327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dan Yang, Ruomeng Qin, Lan Chu, Hengheng Xu, Ling Ni, Junyi Ma, Pengfei Shao, Lili Huang, Bing Zhang, Meijuan Zhang, Yun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHyperintensityWhite matterReactivity (psychology)CognitionNeurosciencePsychologyFunctional connectivityMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the relationships of impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and abnormal functional connectivity (FC) with white matter hyperintensity (WMH)-related cognitive decline. Methods: = 55) groups according to Fazekas visual rating scale. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests and multimodal MRI scans, including 3D-T1, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). The alterations of CVR maps and FC were further explored. Results: Subjects with a higher WMH burden displayed a lower CVR in the left medial occipital gyrus (MOG). The FC analysis using MOG as a seed revealed that the FC of the left insula, left inferior parietal lobule, and thalamus changed abnormally as WMH aggravated. After adjusting for age, gender, and education years, the serial mediation analysis revealed that periventricular white matter hyperintensity contributes indirectly to poorer Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (indirect effect: β = -0.1248, 95% CI: -0.4689, -0188), poorer Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (indirect effect: β = -0.1436, 95% CI: -0.4584, -0.0292) scores, and longer trail making tests A (TMT-A) (indirect effect: β = 0.1837, 95% CI: 0.0069, 0.8273) times, specifically due to the lower CVR of the left MOG and the higher FC of the left insula-MOG. Conclusion: The CVR decline of the left MOG and the abnormal FC of the left insula-MOG attributed to WMH progression were responsible for the poor general cognition (MMSE and MoCA) and information processing speed (TMT-A). The left MOG may act as a connection, which is involved in the processing of cognitive biases by connecting with the left insula-cortical regions in WMH individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207