MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214826913 · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3155281

Dealing With Hierarchical Types and Label Noise in Fine-Grained Entity Typing

2022· article· en· W4214826913 on OpenAlexaff
Junshuang Wu, Richong Zhang, Yongyi Mao, Jinpeng Huai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesState Key Laboratory of Software Development EnvironmentNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBenchmarkingComputer scienceNoise (video)Hierarchical organizationHierarchical database modelArtificial intelligenceData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fine-Grained entity typing is complicated by the fact that type labels form a hierarchical structure, and those training examples usually contain noisy type labels. This paper addresses these two issues by proposing a novel framework that simultaneously models the correlation among hierarchical types and the noise within the training data. Additionally, the framework contains an innovative training approach during which the noise in the training data is progressively removed. Experiments on standard benchmarking datasets validate the proposed framework and establish it as a new state of the art for this problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language ProcessingSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207