MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214832461 · doi:10.1787/9789264204126-14-fr

Évaluation des compétences des adultes (PIAAC) : Liste des participants

2014· book-chapter· fr· W4214832461 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsCégep de Lévis
FundersOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques
KeywordsValuation (finance)PsychologySociologyPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Note de la Turquie : les informations figurant dans ce document qui font référence à « Chypre » concernent la partie méridionale de l'Ile.Il n'y a pas d'autorité unique représentant à la fois les Chypriotes turcs et grecs sur l'Ile.La Turquie reconnaît la République Turque de Chypre Nord (RTCN).Jusqu'à ce qu'une solution durable et équitable soit trouvée dans le cadre des Nations Unies, la Turquie maintiendra sa position sur la « question chypriote ».Note de tous les États de l'Union européenne membres de l'OCDE et de l'Union européenne : la République de Chypre est reconnue par tous les membres des Nations Unies sauf la Turquie.Les informations figurant dans ce document concernent la zone sous le contrôle effectif du gouvernement de la République de Chypre.Les données statistiques concernant Israël sont fournies par et sous la responsabilité des autorités israéliennes compétentes.L'utilisation de ces données par l'OCDE est sans préjudice du statut des hauteurs du Golan, de Jérusalem-Est et des colonies de peuplement israéliennes en Cisjordanie aux termes du droit international.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.018
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.519
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.066 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD eBooksSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207