Intelligent Transport Surveillance Memory Enhanced Method for Detection of Abnormal Behavior in Video
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose is to build a better intelligent transport platform and improve the performance of surveillance video abnormal behavior detection systems under rapid progress of science and technology, to process large-scale traffic surveillance video data. Autoencoder (AE) can detect abnormal behavior by using reconstruction error information. However, it cannot decode some abnormal codes well, so an AE based on memory needs improvement. The objective of this research is to propose a model where abnormal surveillance video can be handled. Therefore, a self-coding method based on memory enhancement is proposed. The steps are as follows: different abnormal behavior detection system algorithms are analyzed at first. The characteristics of three different methods, namely, the original autoencoder (AE), recurrent neural network, and convolutional neural network, are compared. Then, a memory module is proposed to enhance the automatic encoder to reduce the reconstruction error of normal samples and increase the reconstruction error of abnormal samples. The effect image is obtained by Laplace transform and convolution for the image with low definition, and the image with noise is processed by guided filtering. Finally, different methods are used for experimental comparison. Experiments show that, on the dataset Avenue, the frame-level result of the method proposed is about 2% higher than that of the optimal ConvLSTM in the comparison method; on the Ped1 and Ped2 datasets, it is also about 3% higher than ConvLSTM. The comparison of different methods shows that the effect of the method proposed is the best. The self-coding traffic surveillance video abnormal behavior detection system based on memory enhancement is designed with a modular structure and it uses the self-coding method based on memory enhancement. The effectiveness of the proposed method in the real scene is verified by comparing the performance of different methods in the same data set (Xia and Li, 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".