Dietary Fiber, Insulin and Breast Tissue Composition at Age 15–18: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Risk of breast cancer in adult life is influenced by body size and height in childhood, but the mechanisms responsible for these associations are currently unknown. We carried out research to determine if, at age 15-18, measures of dietary intake were associated with body size, hormones, and with variations in breast tissue composition that in adult life are associated with risk of breast cancer. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 766 healthy Caucasian women aged 15-18, we measured percent breast water (PBW), total breast water and fat by magnetic resonance (MR), and assessed dietary intake using a validated food frequency questionnaire. We also measured height, weight, skin-fold thicknesses and waist-to-hip ratio, and in fasting blood assayed glucose and insulin. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, measures of body size, and energy intake, dietary fiber (insoluble and total fiber) and insulin were associated positively and significantly with PBW. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary fiber and fasting insulin were associated with breast tissue measures. These data suggest a potential approach to breast cancer prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".