MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214865803 · doi:10.1117/12.2614081

Histological assessment of an implantable optical sensor and spinal cord tissue interface

2022· article· en· W4214865803 on OpenAlexaff
Farnaz Sahragard, Amanda Cheung, Femke Streijger, Shahbaz Askari, Brian K. Kwon, Babak Shadgan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cordBiomedical engineeringSpinal cord injuryMedicineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We developed an implantable optical sensor based on near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to continuously monitor spinal cord oxygenation and hemodynamics in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). As a safety assessment measure, we aimed to study the effect of near-infrared (NIR) light emission and contact compression of the NIRS sensor on spinal cord tissue structure. Our previous in-vitro heat tests indicated no heat generation by the NIRS sensor. This study evaluated whether the NIRS sensor resulted in any potential compression damage to the spinal cord using histological analysis. Methods: Six Yucatan mini-pigs received a T10 SCI. A custom implantable NIRS sensor (version 2) was placed extradurally on the spinal cord and fixed with magnets and cross-connectors. After seven days of continuous data collection at 100Hz, the sensor was removed to allow for histological examination of the spinal cord tissue. Cellular damage was observed in the spinal cord at the NIRS sensor placement site in two animals. The design, shape, and material of the NIRS sensor were significantly revised to reduce the sensor footprint, minimize the compression on the cord, increase the sensor flexibility, and improve its clinical application. An in-vivo pilot experiment was performed on a Yucatan miniature pig with a T10 SCI to evaluate potential compression damage of the spinal cord tissue from placement and direct contact of the refined NIRS sensor (version 5). A fibrin sealant, TISSEEL, was utilized to fix the version 5 NIRS sensor on the spinal cord. Result: There were no signs of cellular damage, indentation, and significant flattening on the dorsal surface of the spinal cord where the version 5 NIRS sensor was placed for up to 4.5 hours. Conclusion: The refined NIRS sensor did not cause any compression damage to the porcine spinal cord after implantation for 4.5 hours. Implanting this sensor on the spinal cord of SCI patients requires further in-vivo examinations to ensure the sensor is safe to use for up to 14 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207