MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hearing Screening Across a Lifetime: Addressing the Needs of Older Adults

2022· article· en· W4214875215 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catlin Nalley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hearing Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHearing lossMedicinePopulationHealth carePsychological interventionGerontologyAudiologyNursingEnvironmental healthPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To shed light on continued shifts in the global epidemiology of hearing loss while also highlighting available solutions and current challenges, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the first World Report on Hearing last year. The report establishes several priorities, including the need for hearing screening across the course of an individual’s life. “Increasing hearing screening and early intervention coverage during the next 10 years requires an additional annual per capita investment of US$ 1.33,” according to the WHO report. “The resulting health gain during the 10-year period would avert nearly 130 million DALYs (disability adjusted life years), benefit 1.4 billion people and yield a return of nearly US$ 16 for each 1 dollar invested.” 1 In an effort to support the implementation of their recommendations, which includes the urgent need for evidence-based policy action, WHO developed the handbook HEARING Screening: Considerations for Implementation.2 This resource provides guidance on how to address hearing loss in key demographics, including older adults. The need for hearing screening among the aging population has been well-established and audiologists are poised to play a key role in this aspect of care. Integrating hearing services, and more specifically, hearing screening into the care of this patient population begins with an understanding of healthy aging, according to Yuka Sumi, MD, PhD, MPH, Acting Head of the Aging and Health Unit, and Medical Officer at WHO. During a recent webinar led by WHO, Sumi and other experts shared their experiences as well as discussed current challenges and how they can be addressed. “In 2015, the World Report on Aging and Health defined healthy aging as the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age,” noted Sumi, while outlining the key factors of healthy aging: functional ability, intrinsic capacity, and environments. “These three components are very important for the healthy aging,” she continued. “When people age our intrinsic capacity tends to decline, and then the issue becomes more complex and chronic, but by providing a support environment, our functional ability can be maintained.” TOOLS FOR SUCCESS One way to support this patient population is with the right tools, such as Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), which “reflects a continuum of care that will help to reorient health and social services towards a more person-centred and coordinated model of care that supports optimising functional ability for older people,” according to Sumi. The WHO ICOPE screening tool takes a closer look at the key conditions associated with declines in intrinsic capacity, including hearing loss. This and other tools are important when looking at aging and more specifically, hearing loss. Lack of awareness and ongoing stigma must also be addressed to ensure older patients receive the necessary care. When Dr. Arun Agarwal, Medical Advisor – Innovation, Education & Clinical Excellence, Apollo Hospitals Group, India, and colleagues sought to create a program for hearing screening for older adults, they faced a lack of understanding regarding the importance of hearing as well as a stigma that led individuals to often hide their hearing loss and avoid hearing aids. In 1995, Agarwal and his team began advocating with the Government of Delhi and a camp-based approach was initiated. By 1998, 17,000 elderly patients had been screened and 4,000 free hearing aids fitted. This success and the awareness raised among policymakers opened the door to a discussion regarding a national initiative, and in 2007 the Prevention of Control of Deafness was started. Today more than 70% of India’s population is being covered under this program, Agarwal said during his presentation. This example underscores the importance of raising awareness among the public and working closely with policymakers to create true impact and change. A POSITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON AGING As mentioned above, the stigma of hearing loss—and other conditions associated with aging—must be acknowledged and tackled to ensure individuals do not hesitate to seek care or the necessary support. “There is a power to our attitude and our views of aging,” noted Kathy Pichora-Fuller, PhD, Professor Emerita, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University. “There can be discrimination from other people, but we can also discriminate against ourselves if we don’t think about aging in a positive way.” The literature shows that attitude can have an impact on outcomes for older adults, she noted, while referencing a study that found that individuals who don’t have positive attitudes have faster declines in their audiogram. 3 Pichora-Fuller and colleagues have explored how individual’s views of aging affect their self-perception of their hearing, and there continues to be a focus on this area of research. Why does this matter? While screening for hearing loss is crucial, patient attitudes and beliefs are equally important because it often determines whether they decide to follow up and engage in services, explained Pichora-Fuller, who emphasized the need to address these issues directly. “We have to head this off at the pass and counteract some of the negative views of hearing loss and hearing aids, and how those combine with negative views of aging.” Ensuring widespread access to hearing screen and associated care requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders. Success depends on creating a collaborative environment across the continuum of care that not only addresses the importance of hearing and hearing services but also a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges and needs of older adults. Thoughts on something you read here? Write to us at [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Hearing JournalSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207