MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214890603 · doi:10.3390/min12030316

Simulation Algorithm for Water Elutriators: Model Calibration with Plant Data and Operational Simulations

2022· article· en· W4214890603 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jonathan Roy, Claude Bazin, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMitacsArcelorMittal
KeywordsFluidizationIron oreComputer scienceQuartzClassifier (UML)SimulationAlgorithmEnvironmental scienceFluidized bedEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dynamic simulation algorithm based on 1-D transient convection/diffusion transport per particle size class is proposed to simulate a hydraulic classifier operated to selectively remove quartz from an iron oxide concentrate produced by processing the ore from an iron ore mine in northeastern Canada. The calibrated model is used to simulate the operation of dense bed hydraulic classifiers of different sizes and/or under different operating conditions. The simulator predicts the behavior and characteristics of the pulp at different depths within the classifier as a function of time. The simulator is validated by confronting the simulation results to experimental data obtained from sampling industrial and laboratory classifiers. The simulator is then used to assess the role of the fluidization or teeter water and of bed density on the quality of the produced separation of quartz from the valuable iron oxide of the processed ore. The knowledge acquired in the noise-free environment of simulation provides clues on the way to manipulate the hydraulic classifier operating variables in a process control strategy for an industrial scale unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralsSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207