MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214895880 · doi:10.1080/09687599.2021.2007361

A creative non-fiction account of autistic youth integrated physical education experiences

2021· article· en· W4214895880 on OpenAlexaff
Justin A. Haegele, Anthony Maher

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability & Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamFeelingPsychologyContext (archaeology)CurriculumInclusion (mineral)NarrativePerspective (graphical)Physical educationPedagogyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the United States (US), the drive to integrate, or mainstream, disabled students into the same educational settings as their non-disabled peers has resulted in disparate opportunities and experiences. With that, more autistic youth than ever before are expected to assimilate into systems that are often not considerate of their needs and capabilities. We use a creative non-fiction narrative, crafted from qualitative interview data generated with eight autistic youth from the US, to explore subjective feelings of inclusion in integrated physical education contexts. Through Caleb’s story, we explore the complexity of relationships and interactions between autistic youth and their peers and teachers in physical education, and how they may influence the ways and extent to which autistic youth experience feelings of belonging, value and acceptance in physical education spaces. We also consider the role of teacher expectations, curriculum decisions and pedagogical actions in shaping the PE experiences of autistic students. Points of interestThis research explores autistic youths’ perspectives about their experiences in integrated PE contexts in the US and the inclusiveness of those experiences.Findings are presented in a story about Caleb, which shows what challenges within integrated physical education classes may look like from the perspective of autistic youth.Some autistic youth may experience challenges with the hyper-competitive culture often present in integrated physical education classes. Physical educators, like Mr. Jones, can exacerbate these challenges in physical education, perhaps unintentionally, by fostering competitive and physically aggressive behaviors.Caleb’s story highlights often unnoticed repercussions of being dumped into an integrated context, which include the (lack of) meaning he finds in his engagement in activities and (lack of) sense of belonging, acceptance, and value he finds in his overall experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability & SocietySame topicInclusion and Disability in Education and SportFrench-language works237,207