MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214900409 · doi:10.5539/jmsr.v11n1p40

Improving the Life Service of Fe-34Mn-10Al-0.76C Tidal Turbine Blades Using Variable PMF

2022· article· en· W4214900409 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eisa A. Almeshaiei, Lubanah Ahmad, Ibrahim Elgarhi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Effects on Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbineMaterials scienceTurbine bladeAlloyComposite materialStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studied the effect of increasing pulsed magnetic field (PMF) voltage during treating a Fe-34Mn-10Al-0.76C steel alloy used in fabricating a blade to be installed in a tidal turbine on its fatigue lifetime. Fatigue strength for each sample treated using PMF voltages (0, 100 and 160 V) had been investigated experimentally to plot their S-N curves while fatigue lifetime of the tidal turbine had been predicted using mathematical model established by a MATLAB code. The cyclic loadings affect the studied turbine were rearranged using Rainflow algorithm. Results of the study showed that, the blade made of Fe-34Mn-10Al-0.76C steel alloy and treated using PMF 100 v had achieved the highest fatigue resistance. The aforementioned fact had investigated based on comparing among the three specimens under the same conditions. For each specimen, the effect of the tidal turbine operation period according to fatigue lifetime been examined as well and it was investigated that, increasing number of operation hours resulted in a drastic reduction in the turbine’s fatigue life of the turbine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Science ResearchSame topicElectromagnetic Effects on MaterialsFrench-language works237,207