La rencontre familles-professionnels au temps de la covid-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte de la crise sanitaire et sociale causée par la pandémie de la covid-19, comment la rencontre des familles avec les professionnels s’est-elle transformée ? Cette question sera abordée par la description des répercussions que l’accroissement du sentiment d’insécurité et l’imposition de mesures sanitaires entraînent, de manière parallèle, dans la vie des familles et dans la vie personnelle et le travail des professionnels. Le concept de rencontre est employé comme cadre d’analyse de ce qui se joue depuis le début de cette pandémie dans le lien entre les familles et les professionnels chargés de les aider, les soutenir et les accompagner. Cette analyse permet de dégager certains repères pour la pratique professionnelle qui non seulement sont pertinents à ce moment-ci, mais laissent entrevoir ce qui méritera d’être consolidé à la sortie de crise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".