Resource Allocation Using Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS)-Assisted Wireless Networks in Industry 5.0 Scenario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile communication networks evolved from first-generation (1G) to sixth-generation (6G) and the requirement for quality of services (QoS) and higher bandwidth increased. The evolvement of 6G can be deployed in industry 5.0 to fulfill the future industry requirement. However, deploying 6G in industry 6.0 is very challenging, and installing a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is an efficient solution. RIS contains the passive elements which are programmed for the tuning of a wireless channel. We formulate an optimization problem to allocate resources in the RIS-supported network. This article presents a mixed-integer non-linear programable problem (MINLP) considering the industry 5.0 scenario and proposes a novel algorithm to solve the optimization problem. We obtain the ϵ optimal solution using the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm is evaluated in energy efficiency (EE), throughput, latency, and channel allocation. We compare the performance of several algorithms, and the proposed algorithm outperforms all the algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".