Dynamic parallel spin stripes from the 1/8 anomaly to the end of superconductivity in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>La</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>CuO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have carried out neutron spectroscopic measurements on single crystals of ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.6\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Nd}}_{0.4}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ from $0.12\ensuremath{\le}x\ensuremath{\le}0.26$ using time-of-flight techniques. These measurements allow us to follow the evolution of parallel spin stripe fluctuations with energies less than $\ensuremath{\sim}33$ meV, from $x=0.12$ to 0.26. Samples at these hole-doping levels are known to display static (on the neutron-scattering time scale) parallel spin stripes at low temperature, with onset temperatures and intensities which decrease rapidly with increasing $x$. Nonetheless, we report remarkably similar dynamic spectral weight for the corresponding dynamic parallel spin stripes, between 5 and 33 meV, from the 1/8 anomaly near $x=0.12$, to optimal doping near $x=0.19$ to the quantum critical point for the pseudogap phase near $x=0.24$, and finally to the approximate end of superconductivity near $x=0.26$. This observed dynamic magnetic spectral weight is structured in energy with a peak near 17 meV at all dopings studied. Earlier neutron and resonant x-ray scattering measurements on related cuprate superconductors have reported both a disappearance with increasing doping of magnetic fluctuations at ($\ensuremath{\pi}$, $\ensuremath{\pi}$) wave vectors characterizing parallel spin stripe structures and persistant paramagnon scattering away from this wave vector, respectively. Our results for ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.6\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Nd}}_{0.4}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ from 0.12 $\ensuremath{\le}x\ensuremath{\le}0.26$ clearly show persistent parallel spin stripe fluctuations at and around at ($\ensuremath{\pi}$, $\ensuremath{\pi}$), and across the full range of doping studied. These results are also compared to recent theory. Together with a rapidly declining $x$ dependence to the static parallel spin stripe order, the persistent parallel spin stripe fluctuations show a remarkable similarity to the expectations of a quantum spin glass, random t-J model, recently introduced to describe strong local correlations in cuprates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".