MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214924921 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-304178/v1

PROSE – Prospective Randomized Trial of the On-X Mechanical Prosthesis and the St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation (EDIT – March 21,2021& April 16,2021)Part 1 – Preoperative Demographics and Preoperative and Operative Risk Factors

2021· preprint· en· W4214924921 on OpenAlexaff
W.R. Eric Jamieson, John L. Ely, Johan Brink, Timothy Pennel, Paul G. Bannon, Jashvant Patel, Rajiv Gupta, Prasanna Simha Mohan Rao, Damyanti Agrawal, L. Wiklund, A. Pieter Kappetein, Rune Haaverstad, Thomas Geisner, Torsten Doesnt, Christian Schlensak, Sulgunan Nair, Craig Brown, Matthias Siepe, Ralph J. Damiano, Yves Langlois, KM Cherian, Hormoz Azar, John C. Chen, Joseph E. Bavaria, Lynn M. Fedoruk, Nabil A. Munfakh, V Srid, PM Scholz, TA Pfeffer, Jian Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVictoria Heart Institute FoundationJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographicsProsthesisRandomized controlled trialMedicineGeneral surgerySurgeryDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ObjectivesThe PROSE trial purpose is to investigate whether the incidence of thromboembolic – related complications is reduced with a current generation mechanical prosthesis (On-X Life Technologies/CryoLife Inc. – On-X) compared with a previous generation mechanical prosthesis (St Jude Medical – SJM). The primary purpose of the initial report is to document the preoperative demographics, and the preoperative and operative risk factors by individual prosthesis and by Western and Developing populations. MethodsThe PROSE study was conducted in 29 worldwide centres and incorporated 854 subjects randomized between 2003 and 2016. The study enrollment was discontinued on August 31, 2016. The preoperative demographics incorporated age, gender, functional class, etiology, prosthetic degeneration, primary rhythm, primary valve lesion, weight, height, BSA and BMI. The preoperative and operative evaluation incorporated 24 risk factors.ResultsThe total patient population (854) incorporated On-X population (461) and the St Jude Medical population (393). There was no significant difference of any of the preoperative demographics between the On-X and SJM groups. The preoperative and operative risk factors evaluation showed there was no significant difference between the On-X and St Jude Medical populations. The preoperative and operative risk factors by valve position (aortic & mitral) also documented no differentiation. The dominant preoperative demographics of the Western world population were older age, male gender, sinus rhythm, aortic stenosis, congenital aortic lesion, and mitral regurgitation. The dominant demographics of the Developing world population were rheumatic etiology, atrial fibrillation, aortic regurgitation, mixed aortic lesions, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral lesions. The Developing world group had only one significant risk factor, congestive heart failure. The majority of the preoperative and operative risk factors were significant in the Western world population. ConclusionsThe preoperative demographics do not differentiate the prostheses but do differentiate the Western and Developing world populations. The preoperative and operative risk factors do not differentiate the prostheses BUT do differentiate the Western and Developing world populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→