MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214929827 · doi:10.1002/speg.9958

Table of Contents

2001· article· en· W4214929827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpecial Events Galore · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAuction Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorksheetEvent (particle physics)AdvertisingComputer scienceVisual artsArtBusinessPsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three Raffles Add to Foothills Country Auction Fun (and Bottom Line) Raffle No. 1 Raffle No. 2 Raffle No. 3 Popular Auction Showcases Original Artwork Largest Auction in Calgary Draws 900 Attendees Guests Arrive in Black Tie and Cowboy Boots Balloon Raffle Lets All Win ‘Active 20 to 30’ Chapter Runs the Fast‐paced, Fun Event Use Preprinted Polaroid Film To Create Special Memories Denver Kids Have a ‘Field Day’ Include Event Evaluation Notes for Next Year's Event Jeep Raffle Benefits Disabled Vets Use Leftover Program Booklets to Sell Next Year's Event Consolidate Your Events Under One Sponsor Umbrella Pre‐Event Worksheet Helps Determine Feasibility Of Events Being Considered More Worksheet Questions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8380.764

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpecial Events GaloreSame topicAuction Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207