MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214939304 · doi:10.1117/12.2614131

Broadband radio-frequency signal processing with neuromorphic photonics

2022· article· en· W4214939304 on OpenAlexaff
Eric C. Blow, Thomas Ferreira de Lima, Hsuan-Tung Peng, Weipeng Zhang, Chaoran Huang, Bhavin J. Shastri, Paul R. Prucnal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringPhotonicsBroadbandComputer scienceSilicon photonicsRadio frequencyBandwidth (computing)Signal processingElectronic engineeringRadarOptoelectronicsArtificial neural networkTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave photonics and neuromorphic photonics are two parallel research areas which have simultaneously emerged at the forefront of next generation processors. These fields, while initially independent, are naturally converging to a combined silicon photonic platform. An optical processing approach yields wide bandwidth, low latency, and dense interconnection. These photonic systems are capable of supporting applications previously unfeasible. Systems such as photonic cancellers, photonic blind source separation, photonic recurrent neural networks for RF fingerprinting, and photonic neural networks for nonlinear dispersion compensation. This paper will focus on the convergence of microwave photonics and neuromorphic photonics towards an RF optimized machine learning solution. Additionally, this paper investigated the RF noise performance of neuromorphic photonic front-end. The results indicated poor RF performances, leading to the proposal of a balanced linear front-end for noise figure reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207