Regional variation in cholinergic terminal activity determines the non-uniform occurrence of cortical slow-wave activity during REM sleep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sleep consists of two basic stages: non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. NREM sleep is characterized by slow high-amplitude cortical EEG signals, while REM sleep is characterized desynchronized cortical rhythms. While, until recently, it has been widely believed that cortical activity during REM sleep is globally desynchronized, recent electrophysiological studies showed slow waves (SW) in some cortical areas during REM sleep. Electrophysiological techniques, however, have been unable to resolve the regional structure of these activities, due to relatively sparse sampling. We mapped functional gradients in cortical activity during REM sleep using mesoscale imaging in mice, and observed local SW patterns occurring mainly in somatomotor and auditory cortical regions, with minimum presence within the default mode network. The role of the cholinergic system in local desynchronization during REM sleep was also explored by calcium imaging of cholinergic terminal activity within the mouse cortex. Terminal activity was weaker in regions exhibiting SW activity more frequently during REM sleep. We also analyzed Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity dataset and found that these regions have weaker cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".