MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214942312 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00572.2021

Irx5 and transient outward K<sup>+</sup> currents contribute to transmural contractile heterogeneities in the mouse ventricle

2022· article· en· W4214942312 on OpenAlexafffund
Kyoung-Han Kim, Yena Oh, Jie Liu, Saif Dababneh, Ying Xia, Ri Youn Kim, Dae‐Kyum Kim, Kiwon Ban, Mansoor Husain, Chi‐chung Hui, Peter H. Backx

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Foundation of KoreaHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute Foundation
KeywordsContractilityInternal medicineVentricleEndocrinologyDepolarizationContraction (grammar)BiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irx5 is a vital transcription factor that establishes the transmural heterogeneity of ventricular myocyte contractility, thereby ensuring proper contractile function in the healthy heart. Regional differences in excitation-contraction coupling in the ventricular myocardium are primarily mediated through the inverse relationship between Irx5 and the fast transient outward K+ current ( Ito,f) across the ventricular wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→