Monitoring Respiratory Motion during VMAT Treatment Delivery Using Ultra-Wideband Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to evaluate the potential of a low-cost, ultra-wideband radar system for detecting and monitoring respiratory motion during radiation therapy treatment delivery. Radar signals from breathing motion patterns simulated using a respiratory motion phantom were captured during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery. Gantry motion causes strong interference affecting the quality of the extracted respiration motion signal. We developed an artificial neural network (ANN) model for recovering the breathing motion patterns. Next, automated classification into four classes of breathing amplitudes is performed, including no breathing, breath hold, free breathing and deep inspiration. Breathing motion patterns extracted from the radar signal are in excellent agreement with the reference data recorded by the respiratory motion phantom. The classification accuracy of simulated deep inspiration breath hold breathing was 94% under the worst case interference from gantry motion and linac operation. Ultra-wideband radar systems can achieve accurate breathing rate estimation in real-time during dynamic radiation delivery. This technology serves as a viable alternative to motion detection and respiratory gating systems based on surface detection, and is well-suited to dynamic radiation treatment techniques. Novelties of this work include detection of the breathing signal using radar during strong interference from simultaneous gantry motion, and using ANN to perform adaptive signal processing to recover breathing signal from large interference signals in real time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".