Deep Hierarchical Attention Active Learning for Mental Disorder Unlabeled Data in AIoMT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Artificial Intelligence of Medical Things (AIoMT), Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatment (IDPT) effectively improves the quality of mental health treatments. With the advent of COVID-19, psychological tasks have become overloaded and complicated for medical professionals due to the overlap of sentimental values. The development of an AIoMT tool requires labeling of data to achieve clinical-level performance. Text data requires an appropriate set of linguistic features for vector latent representation and segmentation. Emotional biases could lead to incorrect segmentation of patient-authorized texts, and labeling emotional data is time-consuming. In this article, we propose an assistant tool for psychologists to assist them in mental health treatment and note-taking. We first extend the word and emotion lexicon and then apply a hierarchical attention method to support data labeling. The learned latent representation uses word position prediction and sentence-level attention to create a semantic framework. The augmented vector representation helps in highlighting words and classifying nine different symptoms from the text written by the patient. Our experimental results show that the emotion lexicon helps to increase the accuracy by 5% without affecting the overall results, and that the hierarchical attention method achieves an F1 score of 0.89.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it