<i>Wilsoniana</i> sp. associated with white blister rust of <i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> in Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphological and phylogenetic analyses were conducted with two white blister rust specimens from Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson collected in Sinaloa, Mexico. Secondary sporangia were similar to those of Wilsoniana bliti (Biv.) Thines and Wilsoniana amaranthi Y.J. Choi, Thines & H.D. Shin. The coarsely reticulate epispore of the oospores corresponded to W. amaranthi, although they were smaller than those reported in the same species on Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Tell. The diameter of the oospores was similar to that in W. bliti from Amaranthus blitum L., whereas the pattern of ornamentation did not correspond to this species. The phylogenetic analysis confirms that both specimens belong to Wilsoniana but do not correspond to any accepted species within the genus, and they have therefore been designated as Wilsoniana sp. Future research should focus on the description and taxonomic position of species in the genus Wilsoniana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".