Perencanaan Masterplan Pasar Niten di Kabupaten Bantul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Setelah relokasi Pasar Niten lama ke lokasi baru di Jalan Bantul km 5 pada tahun 2009, timbul masalah-masalah baru secara bertahap menyebabkan sepinya pengunjung Pasar Niten di masa kini. Kemudian muncul gagasan BAPPEDA (Badan Perencana Pembangunan Daerah) Bantul untuk merevitalisasi Pasar Niten dengan konsep baru yang lebih representatif, dalam hal ini mengacu pada nilai strategis Bantul sebagai kawasan sub-urban Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Dari permasalahan ini, dibuatlah sebuah strategi yaitu selain sebagai wadah perdagangan dan ekonomi, tipologi turut menjadi wadah yang dapat mengumpulkan berbagai orang dengan latar yang berbeda untuk berdinamika dalam aspek sosial dan ekologi. Dalam mencapai strategi tersebut, diinjeksikan fungsi agriculture dan creative hub melalui pendekatan sustainable food systems dan placemaking sehingga dapat meningkatkan kembali eksistensi Pasar Niten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".