Use of Antifibrinolytics in Pediatric Life-Threatening Hemorrhage: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of antifibrinolytics in children with life-threatening hemorrhage. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the MAssive Transfusion epidemiology and outcomes In Children study dataset, a prospective observational study of children with life-threatening bleeding events. SETTING: Twenty-four children’s hospitals in the United States, Canada, and Italy. PATIENTS: Children 0–17 years old who received greater than 40 mL/kg of total blood products over 6 hours or were transfused under activation of massive transfusion protocol. Intervention/Exposure: Children were compared according to receipt of antifibrinolytic medication (tranexamic acid or aminocaproic acid) during the bleeding event. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics, medications administered, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. Of 449 patients analyzed, median age was 7 years (2–15 yr), and 55% were male. The etiology of bleeding was 46% traumatic, 34% operative, and 20% medical. Twelve percent received antifibrinolytic medication during the bleeding event ( n = 54 unique subjects; n = 18 epsilon aminocaproic acid, n = 35 tranexamic acid, and n = 1 both). The antifibrinolytic group was comparable with the nonantifibrinolytic group on baseline demographic and physiologic parameters; the antifibrinolytic group had longer massive transfusion protocol duration, received greater volume blood products, and received factor VII more frequently. In the antifibrinolytic group, there was significantly less 6-hour mortality overall (6% vs 17%; p = 0.04) and less 6-hour mortality due to hemorrhage (4% vs 14%; p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, bleeding etiology, Pediatric Risk of Mortality score, and plasma deficit, the antifibrinolytic group had decreased mortality at 6- and 24-hour postbleed (adjusted odds ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09–0.93]; p = 0.04 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21–0.98]; p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of antifibrinolytic medications during the life-threatening event was independently associated with improved 6- and 24-hour survivals in bleeding children. Consideration should be given to use of antifibrinolytics in pediatric patients with life-threatening hemorrhage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".