Enterprise Reform and China’s Modernization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In China’s modernization, enterprises have experienced a complex process of change, which has promoted or restricted the process of China’s modernization. From the perspective of government function adjustment; this chapter studies the enterprise transformation process in China’s modernization from a historical perspective. It is found that although micro problems such as corporate governance and principal-agent are very important, they are only the second problem. The first problem should be the adjustment of government functions. The transformation practice of western countries has also proved the importance of flexible adjustment of government functions. In China, during the imperial period, enterprises in modern China did not develop due to the failure of government function adjustment. Thus, to catch up with and surpass the world powers, the new China after 1949 adopted a planned economic system, which is reasonable in the path. The Chinese government carried out the social transformation of market economy orientation after 1979. From then, the enterprises have become modern enterprises in the market economy. The findings of this chapter are of great significance to enhance the institutional innovation of enterprises and promote the process of China’s modernization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it