MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220700924 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.170102

Simulation Investigation of Natural Ventilation on the Thermal Comfort in Arid Regions: Case Ghardaïa

2022· article· en· W4220700924 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelmadjid Kaddour, Salah Bezari, Chutarat Tearnbucha, Weerawat Sudsutad, Giulio Lorenzini, Hijaz Ahmad, Younes Menni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal comfortNatural ventilationVentilation (architecture)Environmental sciencePassive coolingThermalAir conditioningWind speedSolar chimneyInternal heatingMeteorologyArchitectural engineeringMarine engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringGeographySolar energyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building aeration ventilation may contribute to achieve thermal comfort there by economizing huge amount of electricity that would be supplied using conventional air conditioning systems. Natural ventilation maintains thermal equilibrium between heating and cooling balances. They may also be used in conjunction with other systems in certain circumstances. Model governing equation of physical phenomena enabling description the thermo-aeraulic behaviour. Based on the measurements in winter and summer periods of several physical parameters like the wind velocity and the ambient temperature, the influence of infiltration rate on the thermal comfort were demonstrated. The present study is the simulation investigation the evolution of internal multi-zone temperature of Saharan building in Ghardaïa (32°38 N, 3°78 E), Algeria. Building construction process should take advantage of many practices characterizing location traditional construction. Specifically, satisfaction of seasonal thermal comfort requirement (heating, cooling) and favour maximum solar passive gains. The results showed that the major factor for the reduction of the internal temperature of the studied building is the natural ventilation including the thermal comfort range (20-27)℃.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207