Regional Cardiac Motion Scoring With Multi-Scale Motion-Based Spatial Attention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regional cardiac motion scoring aims to classify the motion status of each myocardium segment into one of the four categories (normal, hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic) from multiple short-axis MR sequences. It is essential for prognosis and early diagnosis for various cardiac diseases. However, the complex motion procedure of the myocardium and the invisible pattern differences pose great challenges, leading to low performance for automatic methods. Most existing works mitigate the task by differentiating the normal motion patterns from the abnormal ones, without fine-grained motion scoring. We propose an effective method for the task of cardiac motion scoring by connecting a bottom-up and another top-down branch with a novel motion-based spatial attention module in multi-scale space. Specifically, we use the convolution blocks for low-level feature extraction that acts as a bottom-up mechanism, and the task of optical flow for explicit motion extraction that acts as a top-down mechanism for high-level allocation of spatial attention. To this end, a newly designed Multi-scale Motion-based Spatial Attention (MMSA) module is used as the pivot connecting the bottom-up part and the top-down part, and adaptively weight the low-level features according to the motion information. Experimental results on a newly constructed dataset of 1440 myocardium segments from 90 subjects demonstrate that the proposed MMSA can accurately analyze the regional myocardium motion, with accuracies of 79.3% for 4-way motion scoring, 89.0% for abnormality detection, and correlation of 0.943 for estimation of motion score index. This work has great potential for practical assessmentof cardiac motion function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".