MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

011 Adapting an evidence-based sexual assault prevention intervention for women undergraduates for online delivery

2022· article· en· W4220711083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual assaultIntervention (counseling)PsychologyComputer scienceMedical educationInternet privacyComputer securityMedical emergencyMedicineSuicide preventionPoison controlPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Statement of Purpose</h3> Sexual assault on college campuses is a prevalent public health problem, with 1 in 4 women experiencing sexual assault in college. The Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act (EAAA) is a 12-hour, peer facilitator-led, in-person, group-based, sexual assault resistance intervention that has been shown to reduce rape victimization by 50% among female undergraduates in a randomized controlled trial. Despite its efficacy, uptake of EAAA has been limited, as universities often prefer brief online interventions; however, no online intervention has been proven to reduce sexual assault victimization. <h3>Methods/Approach</h3> This CDC-funded project adapted EAAA for online delivery to groups of students by live facilitators using a systematic adaptation process called ADAPT-ITT. The aims were threefold; first, to conduct a theater test of a minimally adapted internet-delivered EAAA intervention (IDEA3) with 8 undergraduate women; second, to use initial feedback to develop a fully adapted IDEA3 intervention; and third, to conduct a pilot trial (N=64) to test the acceptability and feasibility of the IDEA3 intervention and examine intermediary outcomes shown to be strong mediators of EAAA’s effect on reducing sexual assault victimization. Participants completed baseline and post-test surveys to measure self-defense self-efficacy and other mediators of sexual assault risk, including rape myth acceptance and detection of risk in coercive situations. Feedback was provided through post-session surveys and focus groups. <h3>Results</h3> Theater test participants rated the program’s interactive activities, virtual format, self-defense training, and roleplays highly. The pilot trial will conclude in March 2022. Results on feasibility, acceptability, pre-test/post-test changes in key outcomes, and lessons learned through the adaptation process will be presented. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Preliminary findings indicate that online adaptation was acceptable and feasible. <h3>Significance</h3> Results from this study have the potential to revolutionize campus sexual assault prevention programming by substantially increasing the scalability of this evidence-based sexual assault prevention program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it