Co-Polymer sequence determination over the molar mass distribution by size-exclusion chromatography combined with pyrolysis - gas chromatography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chain sequence of co-polymers strongly affects their physical properties. It is, therefore, of crucial importance for the development and final properties of novel materials. Currently however, few analytical methods are available to monitor the sequence of copolymers. The currently preferred method in copolymer-sequence determination, nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy (NMR), is insensitive (especially when 13C-NMR is required) and often offers little spectral resolution between signals indicative of different subunits. These limitations are especially challenging when one is interested in monitoring the sequence across the molar-mass distribution or in quantifying low abundant subunits. Therefore, we set out to investigate pyrolysis – gas chromatography (Py-GC) as an alternative method. Py-GC is more sensitive than NMR and offers better resolution between various subunits, but it does require calibration, since the method is not absolute. We devised a method to fuse data from NMR and Py-GC to obtain quantitative information on chain sequence and composition for a set of random and block poly(methyl methacrylate-co-styrene) copolymer samples, which are challenging to analyse as MMA tends to fully depolymerize. We demonstrated that the method can be successfully used to determine the chain sequence of both random and block copolymers. Furthermore, we managed to apply Py-GC to monitor the sequence of a random and a block copolymer across the molar-mass distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".