MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Disaster Relief Compensation Computational Framework

2022· article· en· W4220723871 on OpenAlexaff
B. Meenakshi Sundaram, B Rajalakshmi, Babu Aman Singh, Rachit S Kumar, Rohith Arsha

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamagesTamilDisaster areaRevenueComputer sciencePython (programming language)Decision treeBusinessArtificial intelligenceGeographyFinancePolitical scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims to compute the relief fund for the farmers who have been affected by the floods as in recent times a depression over the Jabalpur district, Madhya Pradesh brought heavy rainfall to the regions of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, and Andhra Pradesh, the flooded areas are determined by image classification with the help of live video streaming using python opencv2 library, the revenue can be determined by the following factors, area sown, the area covered and the affected area, which is calculated by the land area that is owned by the farmer. The algorithm (machine learning) - Decision tree regressor algorithm is implemented to classify and predict the fund relief for the farmers. Pertained Mobile Net Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is implemented for detecting floods in different regions in India. Efficacious catastrophe management to subsist with expected future climate change, such as extreme climate precipitation, requires a finite framework to determine such damages and to compute the necessary relief funds to be given to the victims. At long last, it can be reasoned that the proposed model will help the public authority organizations to arrange and give the fundamental alleviation reserves adequately in the most exceedingly terrible hit districts of the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS)Same topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207