MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220727074 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550109

HE-Cool V1.0: Control Model of Hybrid Evaporative Cooler Prototype

2022· article· en· W4220727074 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reni Rahmadewi, Rizal Hanifi, Tesa N. Padilah, Rizka Amalia, Rizki Sya’bani, Asep Maulana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocontrollerBluetoothArduinoSerial portAndroid (operating system)Automotive engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringEvaporative coolerSerial communicationSimulationComputer scienceElectrical engineeringComputer hardwareOperating systemWirelessMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the summer in Indonesia, the climatic conditions continually facilitate the development of one from developing the use of an evaporation-based air cooler to more effective use for sustainable users over long distances. Therefore, this research developed an evaporative cooler prototype system based on HE-COOL V1.0 control model with a design for speed regulation control. The design was conducted with an Arduino microcontroller with various buttons: button 1 represents a low speed, button 2 represents a medium speed, and button 3 represents a high speed. The voltage used in the control model was 9 volts which is a voltage drop from the power supply unit of 220 V, and the port on the Arduino pinout has a 5 V supply. Humidity was detected by a DHT11 sensor with an average percentage of 56% usage factor monitored during an air-conditioning tests process. In addition, the input uses an application installed on an Android smartphone that makes users control the Arduino (device) from a distance of 0 to 21 meters without barriers and 19 meters with barriers using Bluetooth communication between devices. Users can also store and observe the humidity output data through a real-time firebase web database system feature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207