MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220728575 · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.022

EEG spectral exponent as a synthetic index for the longitudinal assessment of stroke recovery

2022· article· en· W4220728575 on OpenAlex
Jacopo Lanzone, Martín Alejandro Colombo, Simone Sarasso, Filippo Zappasodi, Mario Rosanova, Marcello Massimini, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Giovanni Assenza

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Neurophysiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeRegione LombardiaEuropean CommissionTiny Blue Dot FoundationFondazione Regionale per la Ricerca BiomedicaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsElectroencephalographyNeurofeedbackStroke (engine)CardiologyInternal medicinePsychologyPathologicalMedicineAnesthesiaAudiologyNeurosciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG) can capture changes in brain activity following stroke. qEEG metrics traditionally focus on oscillatory activity, however recent findings highlight the importance of aperiodic (power-law) structure in characterizing pathological brain states. We assessed neurophysiological alterations and recovery after mono-hemispheric stroke by means of the Spectral Exponent (SE), a metric that reflects EEG slowing and quantifies the power-law decay of the EEG Power Spectral Density (PSD). METHODS: Eighteen patients (n = 18) with mild to moderate mono-hemispheric Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) ischaemic stroke were retrospectively enrolled for this study. Patients underwent EEG recording in the sub-acute phase (T0) and after 2 months of physical rehabilitation (T1). Sixteen healthy controls (HC; n = 16) matched by age and sex were enrolled as a normative group. SE values and narrow-band PSD were estimated for each recording. We compared SE and band-power between patients and HC, and between the affected (AH) and unaffected hemisphere (UH) at T0 and T1 in patients. RESULTS: At T0, stroke patients showed significantly more negative SE values than HC (p = 0.003), reflecting broad-band EEG slowing. Most important, in patients SE over the AH was consistently more negative compared to the UH and showed a renormalization at T1. This SE renormalization significantly correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement (R = 0.63, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SE is a reliable readout of the neurophysiological and clinical alterations occurring after an ischaemic cortical lesion. SIGNIFICANCE: SE promise to be a robust method to monitor and predict patients' functional outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it